The popularity of large language models (LLMs) has skyrocketed in recent years, fundamentally changing how businesses and individuals engage with technology. Models like ChatGPT are now widely integrated into various applications across industries, with many organizations exploring their use for customer service, content generation, code assistance, and more. However, this rapid adoption comes with its own set of challenges, making observability a critical factor for ensuring the success of these applications. 

Traditionally, observability has focused on system signals to assess its health and performance through metrics such as uptime, response time, and error rates. While this approach works well for conventional applications with predictable outputs, LLMs present a non-deterministic challenge that requires a different strategy. LLM observability also differs from standard machine learning observability; while the latter primarily addresses model drift, LLMs inherently assume drift, particularly when using models from providers like OpenAI, Azure, and AWS that may have outdated data. 

LLM observability is not about predictions where drift is problematic; its nature is more real time, it encompasses the quality of generated responses and the user experience during real-time interactions. These applications run on a complex stack involving vector databases for domain-specific data retrieval, and intricate prompt engineering that interprets user inputs into retrieval commands. These fundamental differences complicate the observability landscape, making it essential to adopt new methods for monitoring and evaluating LLM performance.

The Solution: Observability Data Lakes

To effectively manage the complexities of LLMs, observability data lakes emerge as a vital solution. Originally designed to integrate diverse data sources for analytics, data lakes have evolved to store unstructured and raw data while decoupling storage from compute power, making them highly scalable and cost-effective. The flexibility and real-time processing capabilities of data lakes have been especially appealing for ML and AI workloads, and these advantages also apply to LLM observability.

Here’s why observability data lakes are indispensable for LLM observability:

1. Integration Complexity

The LLM application stack includes various systems, such as high-performance CPUs or GPUs, LLMs, vector databases, prompts, external function calls, and orchestration agents like LangChain and LlamaIndex. For example, when a user asks, “tell me if my recent order qualifies me for future discounts?” The agent first verifies the user’s identity, retrieves order details from the order management system, and checks for applicable discounts based on membership and purchase history, then combines this information into a coherent response.

To analyze these interactions effectively, it’s crucial to evaluate the entire call timeline, assess latency at each stage, and identify bottlenecks. A data lake is essential for monitoring this complex workflow, linking application traces from one call to another, processing data, and storing metrics for analysis. This comprehensive approach provides a holistic view of application performance, making an integrated data lake vital for effective LLM observability.

2. Assessment of LLM Reliability 

Capturing execution traces is necessary, but it’s not sufficient for understanding LLM behavior with regards to prompts and responses. Unlike deterministic applications, where distributed tracing is a primary data point for performance evaluation, LLM-powered applications need more evaluations to detect biased or unexpected outputs that require deeper analysis.

Evaluating model inferences and the quality of generated responses is crucial. Many organizations are using different frameworks to assess metrics related to quality, accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness of LLM outputs, specifically targeting hallucination, toxicity, sensitivity, QA correctness, and code embedding like SQL queries.

An observability data lake facilitates the storage and analysis of this inference data, enabling organizations to derive insights that help fine-tune their models and optimize their retrieval-augmented (RAG) systems. 

  1. Performance Overhead

LLMs are interactive and require real-time responses—just think about your experience with ChatGPT. For an observability system to effectively monitor these applications, it must also operate quickly and efficiently. Any tracking or monitoring processes should not introduce performance overhead. 

A high-performance data lake facilitates rapid data collection and processing, particularly in high-traffic environments or when multiple users or agents interact simultaneously. This underscores the importance of making an observability data lake with fast processing capabilities essential for effective observability.

4. Data Volume Management

As LLM applications grow in complexity, the volume of data they generate also increases significantly. This includes user interactions, contextual inputs from retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, prompt iterations, evaluations, and the storage and analysis of these components, leading to a massive influx of data.

Large-scale LLM applications can produce so much data that traditional observability tools struggle to process it and extract meaningful insights. Without effective data management—like a data lake capable of handling complex information—the sheer volume of data can overwhelm both the system and its developers. 

5. Cost-Efficient Evaluations

Evaluating model performance involves navigating large volumes of comparison data, which can be cost-prohibitive with vendor-hosted solutions. This is particularly true in a SaaS environment, where costs can escalate due to data transmission and the need for iterative evaluations. By utilizing a data lake, organizations can store observability data locally and in their own environment, ensuring that observability costs do not spiral out of control as LLM applications themselves can be quite costly.

6. Deep Insights into the Full Stack

The performance of LLM-based applications is affected by more than just response quality or latency and bottlenecks identified through distributed tracing. A comprehensive observability approach requires insights into the underlying infrastructure, application code, and overall user experience. 

For both web and mobile LLM applications, capturing user interactions—such as clicks and session replays—is crucial. Real User Monitoring (RUM) provides valuable context, and session recordings allow teams to visualize user prompts and responses, enhancing understanding of user behavior. Incorporating user feedback into evaluations is also crucial; for instance, a thumbs-up or thumbs-down rating for each response can reveal user satisfaction. 

An observability data lake integrates datasets from various sources—including traces, metrics, logs, real user monitoring, session replays, product analytics, and continuous profiling—creating a holistic view of application health. This unified approach enables organizations to identify issues across the entire stack, facilitating better evaluations.

7. Data Privacy

LLM observability often entails evaluating sensitive datasets, including company, product, customer, and sometimes patient or financial information. Organizations developing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architectures typically integrate their domain-specific data (ground truth) with general-purpose LLM models. This domain data is usually stored on-premises, often as vector embeddings in vector databases.

In such contexts, a locally deployed observability data lake is crucial. It ensures that sensitive data remains secure while allowing for effective monitoring and evaluation of LLM performance, safeguarding both compliance and user trust.

Conclusion

Observability data lakes have already established themselves within the broader observability landscape by unifying fragmented telemetry data, providing scalable and cost-efficient platforms for monitoring massive amounts of telemetry data. 

They are now gaining momentum in shaping the future of LLM observability. By storing and analyzing both the actual content of the data—crucial for assessing model quality and relevance—and metrics such as throughput and latency, these data lakes have become essential tools for organizations seeking to enhance the performance and reliability of their LLM applications.

KubeCon + CloudNativeCon EU 2025 is coming to London from April 1-4, bringing together cloud-native professionals, developers, and industry leaders for an exciting week of innovation, collaboration, and learning. Don’t miss your chance to be part of the premier conference for Kubernetes and cloud-native technologies. Secure your spot today by registering now! Learn more and register here.